Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39185668›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

Measuring and reducing the carbon footprint of fMRI preprocessing in fMRIPrep.

Nicholas E Souter, Nikhil Bhagwat, Chris Racey, Reese Wilkinson, Niall W Duncan, Gabrielle Samuel, Loïc Lannelongue, Raghavendra Selvan, Charlotte L Rae

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicholas E SouterSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0999-1811
Nikhil BhagwatMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute - Hospital), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6073-7141
Chris RaceySchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7081-8260
Reese WilkinsonDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3908-7313
Niall W DuncanGraduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3225-9119
Gabrielle SamuelDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8111-2730
Loïc LannelongueCambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9135-1345
Raghavendra SelvanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4302-0207
Charlotte L RaeSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4503-4971

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/12/2/29428British Heart Foundation RG/18/13/33946Health Data Research UKMedical Research Council MR/X01178X/1NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre NIHR203312Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computationally expensive data processing in neuroimaging research places demands on energy consumption-and the resulting carbon emissions contribute to the climate crisis. We measured the carbon footprint of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) preprocessing tool fMRIPrep, testing the effect of varying parameters on estimated carbon emissions and preprocessing performance. Performance was quantified using (a) statistical individual-level task activation in regions of interest and (b) mean smoothness of preprocessed data. Eight variants of fMRIPrep were run with 257 participants who had completed an fMRI stop signal task (the same data also used in the original validation of fMRIPrep). Some variants led to substantial reductions in carbon emissions without sacrificing data quality: for instance, disabling FreeSurfer surface reconstruction reduced carbon emissions by 48%. We provide six recommendations for minimising emissions without compromising performance. By varying parameters and computational resources, neuroimagers can substantially reduce the carbon footprint of their preprocessing. This is one aspect of our research carbon footprint over which neuroimagers have control and agency to act upon.

Indexed as

BrainCarbon FootprintImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCarbonComputingfMRIfMRIPrepfootprintneuroimagingpreprocessing

Identifiers

PMID39185668
PMCPMC11345634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.