Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39185557›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2024

Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Liver Resection is a Treatment Option for Patients With Peritoneal and Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer.

Vegar Johansen Dagenborg, Kristoffer Watten Brudvik, Christin Lund-Andersen, Annette Torgunrud, Marius Lund-Iversen, Kjersti Flatmark, Stein Gunnar Larsen, Sheraz Yaqub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vegar Johansen DagenborgDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9851-1866
Kristoffer Watten BrudvikDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1503-2107
Christin Lund-AndersenDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7277-6612
Annette TorgunrudDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5751-9549
Marius Lund-IversenDepartment of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2025-4062
Kjersti FlatmarkDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7409-0780
Stein Gunnar LarsenDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9831-1995
Sheraz YaqubDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5696-2319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) in patients also treated for colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) frequently metastasizes to the liver and peritoneum and is associated with a poor prognosis. In selected patients, a benefit in overall survival (OS) was shown for both peritoneal metastases (PM-CRC) offered CRS-HIPEC, and CLM treated with surgical resection. However, the presence of CLM was considered a relative contraindication to CRS-HIPEC, causing a paucity of outcome data in this patient group.

methodsPatients with PM-CRC having CRS-HIPEC at a single national center between 2007 and 2023, with additional intervention for CLM, were included (previous curative treatment for extraperitoneal and extrahepatic metastases was allowed). Three groups were defined: CLM before CRS-HIPEC (pre-CRS-HIPEC), CLM resected simultaneously with CRS-HIPEC (sim-CRS-HIPEC), and CLM after CRS-HIPEC (post-CRS-HIPEC), aiming to retrospectively analyze outcomes.

resultsFifty-seven patients were included and classified as: pre-CRS-HIPEC (n = 11), sim-CRS-HIPEC (n = 29), and post-CRS-HIPEC (n = 17). Median Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) was 8; 13 patients had severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3), and no 90-day mortality. Median OS was 48 months after CRS-HIPEC. PCI was a predictor of OS (hazard ratio: 1.11, P < 0.001). We observed no difference in short or long-term outcomes between intervention groups. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that patients with CLM having CRS-HIPEC had comparable OS to reports on CRS-HIPEC only, likely explained by a low PCI. Simultaneous CLM resection did not increase the risk of severe complications.

conclusionsIn this national cohort, CRS-HIPEC and CLM intervention offers long-term survival, suggesting that this treatment may be offered to selected patients with PM-CRC and CLM.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHepatectomyHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyLiver NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultAgedCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39185557
PMCPMC11446514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.