Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39185476›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024

Cone-beam CT with a noncircular (sine-on-sphere) orbit: imaging performance of a clinical system for image-guided interventions.

A Kyle Jones, Moiz Ahmad, Shaan M Raza, Stephen R Chen, Jeffrey H Siewerdsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A Kyle JonesUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Imaging Physics, Houston, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-8573
Moiz AhmadUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Imaging Physics, Houston, Texas, United States.
Shaan M RazaUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Houston, Texas, United States.
Stephen R ChenUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Interventional Radiology, Houston, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5580-831X
Jeffrey H SiewerdsenUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Imaging Physics, Houston, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6644-1317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We aim to compare the imaging performance of a cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging system with noncircular scan protocols (sine-on-sphere) to a conventional circular orbit. Approach: A biplane C-arm system (ARTIS Icono; Siemens Healthineers) capable of circular and noncircular CBCT acquisition was used, with the latter orbit (sine-on-sphere, "Sine Spin") executing a sinusoidal motion with Results: The noncircular scan protocol exhibited several advantages associated with improved 3D sampling-evident in the NPS as filling of the null cone about the Conclusions: Image quality differences between circular and noncircular CBCT orbits were quantitatively evaluated on a clinical system in the context of neurosurgery. The primary performance advantage for the noncircular orbit was the improved sampling and elimination of cone-beam artifacts.

Indexed as

cone-beam CTimage-guided surgeryimaging performancenoncircular orbitsource-detector trajectory

Identifiers

PMID39185476
PMCPMC11342057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.