ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Factors Affecting Outcomes of Stereoacuity in Partially Refractive Accommodative Esotropia with Motor Success Treated by Preoperative Prism Correction and Surgery.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy of botulinum toxin and surgery in managing acute acquired comitant esotropia.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Favorable stereoacuity does not develop in all patients with partially refractive accommodative esotropia (PRAET) successfully aligned, and there have been few previous reports on the factors influencing stereoacuity outcomes in patients with PRAET treated with prismatic correction (PPC) and/or surgery. This study aimed to analyze factors affecting stereoacuity outcomes in patients of PRAET treated with PPC and surgery. Study Design: Retrospective study. Methods: Sixty-six patients with alignment within 10 prism diopters at final visit with PPC and surgery were included. According to the final stereoacuity, patients were grouped into the fine group (≤60 arcsec (")), the coarse group (60 "<, 3000" ≤), and absent stereoacuity group. Preoperative patient characteristics were compared among three groups using analysis of variance. Comparison of final stereoacuity among three groups based on age at onset (very early: ≤6 months; early: >6 months, ≤2 years; late: >2 years) was carried out with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: There were no differences in ages at initial PPC, at surgery, at final visit, durations of misalignment, of PPC, or after surgery; however, significant differences in ages at onset and initial visit were found. Age at onset in the absent group was significantly earlier than those of the fine and the coarse groups (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, of the 25 patients with age at onset >2 years, 18 patients (72%) showed fine or coarse stereoacuity (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Although stereoacuity outcomes in patients with early onset were poor despite of the finally successful alignments obtained with PPC and surgery, fine stereoacuity and coarse stereoacuity were obtained in 24% and 44% of patients with age at onset >2 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.