Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39185322›Full record

ArticleImmuno-oncology technology2024

Integrated noninvasive diagnostics for prediction of survival in immunotherapy.

M Yeghaian, Z Bodalal, T M Tareco Bucho, I Kurilova, C U Blank, E F Smit, M S van der Heijden, T D L Nguyen-Kim, D van den Broek, R G H Beets-Tan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immuno-oncology technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M YeghaianDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Z BodalalDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T M Tareco BuchoDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I KurilovaDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C U BlankDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E F SmitPulmonology Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
M S van der HeijdenDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T D L Nguyen-KimDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D van den BroekDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R G H Beets-TanDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S TrebeschiDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Integrating complementary diagnostic data sources promises enhanced robustness in the predictive performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models, a crucial requirement for future clinical validation/implementation. In this study, we investigate the potential value of integrating data from noninvasive diagnostic modalities, including chest computed tomography (CT) imaging, routine laboratory blood tests, and clinical parameters, to retrospectively predict 1-year survival in a cohort of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, melanoma, and urothelial cancer treated with immunotherapy. Patients and methods: The study included 475 patients, of whom 444 had longitudinal CT scans and 475 had longitudinal laboratory data. An ensemble of AI models was trained on data from each diagnostic modality, and subsequently, a model-agnostic integration approach was adopted for combining the prediction probabilities of each modality and producing an integrated decision. Results: Integrating different diagnostic data demonstrated a modest increase in predictive performance. The highest area under the curve (AUC) was achieved by CT and laboratory data integration (AUC of 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.85, Conclusions: In our retrospective cohort, integrating different noninvasive data modalities improved performance.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancer survival predictionimmunotherapyintegrated diagnosticslongitudinal datamachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39185322
PMCPMC11342748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.