The Impact of Optimized Blinking on Vision and Related Parameters in Individuals With Computer Vision Syndrome: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

introductionComputer vision syndrome (CVS) has become a significant issue for individuals working on computers and digital devices for extended periods. The ocular and periocular symptoms and signs associated with CVS are a major concern, affecting individuals physically and financially. Additionally, CVS has been linked to the rapid progression of myopia, exacerbating the situation. Blinking has been one of the major treatment methods for the treatment of CVS. This study presents a unique and novel randomized controlled therapeutic trial that evaluates the impact of extended blinking therapy on eye health and vision, along with other related parameters. Materials and methods: The present study is a randomized controlled trial conducted from September 2022 to April 2024. Participants aged 18-40 with CVS and a computer vision syndrome questionnaire (CVS-Q) score of ≥6, with mild to moderate refractive error (between -6D and +4D), were included. The sample size was determined based on a pilot study, resulting in a minimum required sample size of 36 patients (18 cases and 18 controls). Participants were randomly assigned to either the case (interventional) or control (conventional) group and were followed up for six months. Cases received conventional CVS treatment plus optimized blinking exercises, while controls received conventional therapy only. Comprehensive ocular assessments were conducted bi-monthly over six months, evaluating changes in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refractive error, near point of accommodation (NPA), near point of convergence (NPC), Schirmer's test, and tear film breakup time (TBUT).

resultsThe study included 20 patients in the case group and 18 in the control group, primarily aged 20-29 (60.5%). Most patients used laptops for their activities (55.26%). The CVS-Q score significantly decreased in both groups following treatment, with both cases and controls showing significant improvement (p<0.001 for both groups). UCVA in the right eye (RE) and left eye (LE) of the cases improved significantly post-treatment in the interventional group (RE: p=0.002; LE: p<0.001). A significant change in refractive error, which is measured as spherical equivalent (SE), was seen among cases following treatment (RE: p<0.001; LE: p=0.021). Controls showed no significant changes in visual acuity or refractive error. The NPA in the cases improved significantly in the RE (p=0.027) but not in the left. The NPC in the intervention group showed no significant change, while controls showed considerable improvement (p=0.042). Schirmer's test results showed no significant change in either group. However, TBUT in the cases improved significantly (RE: p<0.001; LE: p<0.001). In the controls, TBUT decreased significantly, indicating a deterioration in tear film stability. Asthenopia grades improved considerably in cases, while controls showed only some improvement. Severe symptoms still remained in the control group, emphasizing the potential benefits of the blinking exercise in reducing asthenopia symptoms.

conclusionOptimized blinking therapy significantly improves vision and refractive error, tear film stability, and discomfort, making it beneficial for chronic computer users to maintain ocular health and enhance productivity and quality of life.