Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39185120›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Pilot testing the Engaging Generations (eGen) Program to address social well-being among lower-income older adults.

Cindy E Tsotsoros, Emma Pascuzzi, Melanie Brasher, Kristin Souza, Skye N Leedahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cindy E TsotsorosDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States.
Emma PascuzziDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States.
Melanie BrasherDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States.
Kristin SouzaCenter for Career and Experiential Education, The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States.
Skye N LeedahlDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to address digital inclusion and social well-being for older adults was particularly apparent for those from disadvantaged communities. This pilot program provided access to technology and intergenerational mentorship to older adult participants interested in receiving and learning how to utilize an iPad. Pre/post-changes were examined for social well-being in the areas of quality of life, social isolation, and loneliness. Methods: This study conducted pre- and post-surveys with older participants ( Results: The study sample included older adults (Mean age = 72.3) who were mostly lower income (82.3%) and self-reported as Black (13.6%), Hispanic (21.7%), and White (56.5%). Significant differences were identified in participant pre/post-survey scores for social isolation, loneliness, and a global measure of quality of life. Qualitative analyses suggest improvements in various aspects of social well-being. Themes showed that participants believed the program contributed to (1) enhanced mood and mental health, (2) improved quality of life, (3) sense of purpose and feelings of being less alone, (4) ability to use video calling to connect with others; and (5) ability to more freely use email, texting, and messaging to communicate with others. Discussion: This research demonstrates that this pilot program seemed to contribute to reduced social isolation and loneliness for participants, and participants stated more positive social well-being following program participation. However, future research with larger samples is needed to expand upon these findings. Future studies will examine the pathways between technology improvements and social well-being and examine group differences.

Indexed as

COVID-19LonelinessPovertyQuality of LifeSocial IsolationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntergenerational RelationsMalePilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesintergenerational relationshipsinterventionlonelinessquality of lifesocial isolationtechnology

Identifiers

PMID39185120
PMCPMC11341419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.