Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39185070›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medical case reports2024

Chicken bones: An etiology of a misleading clinical presentation of a rare case report of appendicular perforation.

Trabelsi Mohamed Mehdi, Kammoun Neirouz, Nasseh Souhir, Bhouri Souha, Chaouch Mohamed Ali, Oueslati Annouar, Khalfallah Mehdi, Nouira Ramzi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Trabelsi Mohamed MehdiDepartment B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1649-4327
Kammoun NeirouzDepartment B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0830-4984
Nasseh SouhirDepartment B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Bhouri SouhaDepartment B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Chaouch Mohamed AliGeneral Surgery Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9013-5229
Oueslati AnnouarDepartment B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Khalfallah MehdiDepartment B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Nouira RamziDepartment B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foreign body (FB) ingestion leading to appendicular perforation, although rare in adults, presents a complex clinical challenge. The clinical presentation may not always be straightforward, necessitating a comprehensive array of diagnostic examinations. In fact, accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial to prevent severe complications. In this report, we present a case where a misleading clinical presentation led to the unexpected discovery of appendicular perforation during surgery, despite initial suspicion of small bowel perforation - a 77-year-old male patient who was edentulous and under follow-up for chronic bronchitis stage IV. He sought medical attention due to a 2-week history of right iliac fossa pain, during which he did not experience vomiting or fever. Upon physical examination, there was a tenderness noted in the sub umbilical region. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan was performed, revealing the presence of a dense FB which seems to be a bone located in the last ileal loop. Additionally, the appendix appeared slightly distended. Given the clinical presentation, which strongly indicated acute peritonitis resulting from small bowel perforation, and following consultation with gastroenterologists, it was decided that endoscopic retrieval was not suitable for this case. Therefore, a surgical approach was chosen, involving a midline incision, as laparoscopy was absolutely contraindicated because of patient's respiratory distress. Per-operatively, we identified a clear effusion, and within the wall of the appendix, we discovered a thin, sharp chicken bone that had become lodged, resulting in a phlegmonous and perforated appendix. The 2-cm bone was successfully removed, and an appendectomy was performed. The post-operative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the fourth postoperative day. This case highlights the need for a high index of suspicion for atypical clinical presentations and the ongoing need for research to improve our understanding and management of this rare condition, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Indexed as

appendicitisCase reportchicken boneforeign body

Identifiers

PMID39185070
PMCPMC11342422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.