ArticleTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)2024
Effects of Low-Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation in Bilateral Zona Incerta for a Patient With Tremor and Cerebellar Ataxia.
Article in Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deep Brain Stimulation for Cerebellar Ataxia: A Systematic Review on Indications, Targets and Outcomes.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- The research focus and frontiers in surgical treatment of essential tremor.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Whether low-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the caudal zona incerta (cZi) can improve cerebellar ataxia symptoms remains unexplored. Case Report: We report a 66-year-old man initially diagnosed with essential tremor and subsequently developed cerebellar ataxia after bilateral cZi DBS implantation. We tested the effects of low-frequency DBS stimulations (sham, 10 Hz, 15 Hz, 30 Hz) on ataxia severity. Discussion: Low-frequency cZi DBS improves ataxic speech at 30 Hz, but not at 10 Hz or 15 Hz in this patient. Low-frequency DBS did not improve gait or stance. Therefore, low-frequency stimulation may play a role in treating ataxic speech. Highlights: The finding of this case study suggests that bilateral low-frequency DBS at 30 Hz in the caudal zona incerta has the potential to improve ataxic speech but has limited impact on gait and stance. The involvement of zona incerta in speech warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.