ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Filling the gap: brief neuropsychological assessment protocol for glioma patients undergoing awake surgeries.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative Hemodynamic Management and Cerebral Protection During Awake Craniotomy: Evidence-Based Approaches.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Neuropsychological Aspects of a Patient With Intracranial Rosai-Dorfman Disease: Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- From classic models to new pathways: unraveling the anatomy and function of the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus in language processing.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The literature lacks a concise neurocognitive test for assessing primary cognitive domains in neuro-oncological patients. This study aims to describe and assess the feasibility of the Ohy-Maldaun Fast Track Cognitive Test (OMFTCT), used to pre- and post-operatively evaluate patients undergoing brain tumor surgery in language eloquent areas. The cognitive diagnosis was used to safely guide intraoperative language assessment. Methods: This is a prospective longitudinal observational clinical study conducted on a cohort of 50 glioma patients eligible for awake craniotomies. The proposed protocol assesses multiple cognitive domains, including language, short-term verbal and visual memories, working memory, praxis, executive functions, and calculation ability. The protocol comprises 10 different subtests, with a maximum score of 50 points, and was applied at three time points: preoperative, immediately postoperative period, and 30 days after surgery. Results: Among the initial 50 patients enrolled, 36 underwent assessment at all three designated time points. The mean age of the patients was 45.3 years, and they presented an average of 15 years of education. The predominant tumor types included Glioblastoma, IDH-wt (44.1%), and diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-mutant (41.2%). The tumors were located in the left temporal lobe (27.8%), followed by the left frontal lobe (25%). The full test had an average application time of 23 min. Conclusion: OMFTCT provided pre- and postoperative assessments of different cognitive domains, enabling more accurate planning of intraoperative language testing. Additionally, recognition of post-operative cognitive impairments played a crucial role in optimizing patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.