Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184927›Full record

ReviewTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer2024

Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer guidelines 2024.

Jianbin Li, Chunfang Hao, Kun Wang, Jian Zhang, Jiayi Chen, Yueping Liu, Jianyun Nie, Min Yan, Qiang Liu, Cuizhi Geng and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jianbin LiSenior Department of Oncology, Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chunfang HaoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Kun WangDepartment of Breast Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian ZhangBreast Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiayi ChenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yueping LiuDepartment of Pathology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jianyun NieDepartment of Breast Cancer, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Min YanThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Qiang LiuBreast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Cuizhi GengBreast Center, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiaojia WangDepartment of Breast Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Haibo WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Shusen WangDepartment of Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Jiong WuBreast Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yongmei YinDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Erwei SongBreast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zefei JiangSenior Department of Oncology, Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Developing guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of common cancers in China based on the evidence-based practice, the availability of diagnosis and treatment products, and the up-to-date advances in precision medicine is one of the basic tasks of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer (CSCO BC) Committee. Methods: Protocols with high evidence level and good availability are used as the Level I recommendations; protocols with relatively high evidence level but slightly lower expert consensus or with poor availability are used as the Level II recommendations; and protocols that are clinically applicable but with low evidence level are regarded as the Level III recommendations. Based on the findings of clinical research at home and abroad and the opinions of CSCO BC experts, the CSCO BC guidelines determine the levels of recommendations for clinical application. Results: For human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, a combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab regimen were recommended as Level I recommendation for neoadjuvant and first line metastatic breast cancer. Pyrotinib is also recommended as Level I recommendation in first line and second line therapy according to the latest studies conducted in China. Antibody drug conjugates was also recommended for patients with trastuzumab progression. For triple negative breast cancer, immunotherapy in early and metastatic breast cancer was highlighted and listed as new chapters in this version of guideline. For hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) was recommended in different stages, especially in adjuvant therapy. There was also a new chapter for HER2-low breast cancer stratified by HR status. Conclusions: We firmly believe that evidence-based, availability-concerned, and consensus-based guidelines will be more feasible for clinical practice in China and in other countries with similar situations.

Indexed as

Breast cancerChinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO)recommendationstagessubtypes

Identifiers

PMID39184927
PMCPMC11341997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.