Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184882›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2024

Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of

Raghu Devaraju, Divya Reddy, Santhosh T Paul, Umme Azher, Keerthy Umashankar, Likhith Srinivas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raghu DevarajuDepartment of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Divya ReddyDepartment of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Santhosh T PaulDepartment of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Umme AzherDepartment of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Keerthy UmashankarDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Priya Multispeciality Dental Clinic, Sainagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Likhith SrinivasDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology & Microbiology, Vista 32 Multispeciality Dental Clinic, Yelahanka New Town, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vital pulp therapy procedures in primary dentition focuses on preservation and maintenance of pulp tissue that has been compromised due to caries, trauma, etc. Several pulp dressing materials have been used in primary teeth and some natural materials from the field of traditional medicine have also been introduced as medicaments in vital pulp therapy. The understanding of biologic and cytotoxic properties of newer materials is important for safe clinical usage. The biologic compatibility of these newer materials is imperative to limit or avoid tissue irritation or degeneration. Aim: To evaluate the cytotoxic effects of Materials and methods: Primary pulp fibroblasts were cultured from the pulp tissue obtained from extracted deciduous primary canines and central incisor teeth. The freshly prepared concentrations of 1000, 500, 250, 125, and 62.5 µg/mL Results: The MTT assay results revealed that Conclusion: How to cite this article: Devaraju R, Reddy D, Paul ST,

Indexed as

Allium sativumCytotoxicityGarlic extractHuman dental pulp fibroblasts

Identifiers

PMID39184882
PMCPMC11339490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.