Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184865›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2024

From care practices to speculative vignettes-design considerations for robots in good care.

Ralf Vetter, Anna Dobrosovestnova, Helena Anna Frijns, Laura Vogel, Katharina Brunnmayr, Christopher Frauenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ralf VetterHuman-Computer Interaction Division, Department for Artificial Intelligence and Human Interfaces, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Anna DobrosovestnovaInstitute of Visual Computing and Human-Centered Technology, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Helena Anna FrijnsInstitute of Management Science, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Laura VogelInstitute of Management Science, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina BrunnmayrInstitute of Visual Computing and Human-Centered Technology, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Christopher FrauenbergerHuman-Computer Interaction Division, Department for Artificial Intelligence and Human Interfaces, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The care sector has become one of the test beds for developing robotic technologies, which have been promised to mitigate problems with aging populations and labor shortages. Despite these promises, the practical application of such technologies have been met with limited success. Apart from technical limitations, other challenges exist in the way we approach designing these technologies. Critical to the development in the care sector is understanding the complexity of the contexts, the needs and goals of diverse actors, and how these are socio-materially scaffolded. This paper presents a study conducted at the intersection of a value sensitive design and speculative design to understand these sensitivities. Based on the data collected in interviews (n = 6) and card workshops (n = 6) from care workers and residents in mobile care and care home contexts in Austria, we developed five themes capturing situated practices and understandings of good care as built on trust-developing routines, negotiations between different actors, affective and reciprocal dimension of care, care worker self-care, and material mediations. Subsequently, we created six speculative vignettes which serve as rhetorical devices to emphasize the tensions that arise with any technological intervention entering and reshaping existing care practices and relations. We argue that our approach can support robot designers to develop a rich understanding of the values and tensions in the specific context under study from the before design and development begin.

Indexed as

care-centered value sensitive designdesign considerationsfield studiesgood carereflexive thematic analysisrobotsspeculative designvignettes

Identifiers

PMID39184865
PMCPMC11341297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.