ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2024
Enhanced accuracy with Segmentation of Colorectal Polyp using NanoNetB, and Conditional Random Field Test-Time Augmentation.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopy is a reliable diagnostic method to detect colorectal polyps early on and prevent colorectal cancer. The current examination techniques face a significant challenge of high missed rates, resulting in numerous undetected polyps and irregularities. Automated and real-time segmentation methods can help endoscopists to segment the shape and location of polyps from colonoscopy images in order to facilitate clinician's timely diagnosis and interventions. Different parameters like shapes, small sizes of polyps, and their close resemblance to surrounding tissues make this task challenging. Furthermore, high-definition image quality and reliance on the operator make real-time and accurate endoscopic image segmentation more challenging. Deep learning models utilized for segmenting polyps, designed to capture diverse patterns, are becoming progressively complex. This complexity poses challenges for real-time medical operations. In clinical settings, utilizing automated methods requires the development of accurate, lightweight models with minimal latency, ensuring seamless integration with endoscopic hardware devices. To address these challenges, in this study a novel lightweight and more generalized Enhanced Nanonet model, an improved version of Nanonet using NanonetB for real-time and precise colonoscopy image segmentation, is proposed. The proposed model enhances the performance of Nanonet using Nanonet B on the overall prediction scheme by applying data augmentation, Conditional Random Field (CRF), and Test-Time Augmentation (TTA). Six publicly available datasets are utilized to perform thorough evaluations, assess generalizability, and validate the improvements: Kvasir-SEG, Endotect Challenge 2020, Kvasir-instrument, CVC-ClinicDB, CVC-ColonDB, and CVC-300. Through extensive experimentation, using the Kvasir-SEG dataset, our model achieves a mIoU score of 0.8188 and a Dice coefficient of 0.8060 with only 132,049 parameters and employing minimal computational resources. A thorough cross-dataset evaluation was performed to assess the generalization capability of the proposed Enhanced Nanonet model across various publicly available polyp datasets for potential real-world applications. The result of this study shows that using CRF (Conditional Random Fields) and TTA (Test-Time Augmentation) enhances performance within the same dataset and also across diverse datasets with a model size of just 132,049 parameters. Also, the proposed method indicates improved results in detecting smaller and sessile polyps (flats) that are significant contributors to the high miss rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.