Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184863›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2024

Enhanced accuracy with Segmentation of Colorectal Polyp using NanoNetB, and Conditional Random Field Test-Time Augmentation.

Muhammad Sajjad Hussain, Umer Asgher, Sajid Nisar, Vladimir Socha, Arslan Shaukat, Jinhui Wang, Tian Feng, Rehan Zafar Paracha, Muhammad Ali Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammad Sajjad HussainDepartment of Computer Science, Sir Syed (CASE) Institute of Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Umer AsgherLaboratory of Human Factors and Automation in Aviation, Department of Air Transport, Faculty of Transportation Sciences, Czech Technical University in Prague (CTU), Prague, Czechia.
Sajid NisarDepartment of Mechanical and Electrical Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University of Advanced Science, Kyoto, Japan.
Vladimir SochaLaboratory of Human Factors and Automation in Aviation, Department of Air Transport, Faculty of Transportation Sciences, Czech Technical University in Prague (CTU), Prague, Czechia.
Arslan ShaukatDepartment of Computer and Software Engineering, College of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering (CoEME), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Jinhui WangInstitute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Tian FengDepartment of Physical Education, Physical Education College of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Rehan Zafar ParachaSchool of Interdisciplinary Engineering and Sciences (SINES), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ali KhanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering (CoEME), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonoscopy is a reliable diagnostic method to detect colorectal polyps early on and prevent colorectal cancer. The current examination techniques face a significant challenge of high missed rates, resulting in numerous undetected polyps and irregularities. Automated and real-time segmentation methods can help endoscopists to segment the shape and location of polyps from colonoscopy images in order to facilitate clinician's timely diagnosis and interventions. Different parameters like shapes, small sizes of polyps, and their close resemblance to surrounding tissues make this task challenging. Furthermore, high-definition image quality and reliance on the operator make real-time and accurate endoscopic image segmentation more challenging. Deep learning models utilized for segmenting polyps, designed to capture diverse patterns, are becoming progressively complex. This complexity poses challenges for real-time medical operations. In clinical settings, utilizing automated methods requires the development of accurate, lightweight models with minimal latency, ensuring seamless integration with endoscopic hardware devices. To address these challenges, in this study a novel lightweight and more generalized Enhanced Nanonet model, an improved version of Nanonet using NanonetB for real-time and precise colonoscopy image segmentation, is proposed. The proposed model enhances the performance of Nanonet using Nanonet B on the overall prediction scheme by applying data augmentation, Conditional Random Field (CRF), and Test-Time Augmentation (TTA). Six publicly available datasets are utilized to perform thorough evaluations, assess generalizability, and validate the improvements: Kvasir-SEG, Endotect Challenge 2020, Kvasir-instrument, CVC-ClinicDB, CVC-ColonDB, and CVC-300. Through extensive experimentation, using the Kvasir-SEG dataset, our model achieves a mIoU score of 0.8188 and a Dice coefficient of 0.8060 with only 132,049 parameters and employing minimal computational resources. A thorough cross-dataset evaluation was performed to assess the generalization capability of the proposed Enhanced Nanonet model across various publicly available polyp datasets for potential real-world applications. The result of this study shows that using CRF (Conditional Random Fields) and TTA (Test-Time Augmentation) enhances performance within the same dataset and also across diverse datasets with a model size of just 132,049 parameters. Also, the proposed method indicates improved results in detecting smaller and sessile polyps (flats) that are significant contributors to the high miss rates.

Indexed as

colonoscopycolorectal cancerconditional random fieldlightweight deep learning modelspolyp segmentationtest-time augmentation

Identifiers

PMID39184863
PMCPMC11341306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.