Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184847›Full record

Trial reportThe Pan African medical journal2024

Intravenous versus intracuff alkalinized lidocaine to prevent postoperative sore throat: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Salma Ketata, Yassine Maktouf, Imen Zouche, Sarhane Feki, Mariem Keskes, Ayman Trigui, Amira Akrout, Rahma Daoud, Amine Chaabouni, Hichem Cheikhrouhou

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Pan African medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Salma KetataDepartment of Anesthesiology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
Yassine MaktoufDepartment of Anesthesiology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
Imen ZoucheDepartment of Anesthesiology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
Sarhane FekiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
Mariem KeskesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
Ayman TriguiDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
Amira AkroutDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
Rahma DaoudDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
Amine ChaabouniDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
Hichem CheikhrouhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: postoperative sore throat (POST) is a common complication after general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation caused by tracheal mucosal injury. Multiple techniques prevent postoperative sore throat (POST). Our study aimed to compare two techniques: intravenous and intracuff lidocaine versus placebo to prevent postoperative sore throat after general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation. Methods: we conducted a prospective double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial involving patients, proposed for a scheduled surgery less than 240 minutes under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation. Patients were divided into three groups: L group: infused with saline, cuff filled with alkalinized lidocaine. S group: Infused with 1.5 mg/kg of lidocaine, cuff filled with saline. T group: placebo: infused with saline, cuff filled with saline. Our primary outcome was the incidence of sore throat and their (visual analog scale) VAS score in the first 24 postoperative hours. Our secondary outcomes were the incidence of cough, dysphonia, dysphagia, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: ninety patients were analyzed and divided into 3 groups of 30. The incidence of POST at the sixth postoperative hour, for placebo, the "L" group, and the "S" group, respectively, was 67%, 30%, and 47%. And at the 24 Conclusion: intravenous and intracuff lidocaine allowed better control of postoperative sore throat.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, LocalIntubation, IntratrachealLidocainePharyngitisPostoperative ComplicationsAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative Nausea and VomitingProspective StudiesYoung AdultAnesthetics, LocalLidocainecoughendotracheal intubationgeneral anesthesiaintracuff lidocaineIntravenous lidocainepostoperative sore throat

Identifiers

PMID39184847
PMCPMC11343497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.