Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184835›Full record

ArticleACS nanoscience Au2024

Light-Responsive and Antibacterial Graphenic Materials as a Holistic Approach to Tissue Engineering.

Andrea Ferreras, Ana Matesanz, Jabier Mendizabal, Koldo Artola, Yuta Nishina, Pablo Acedo, José L Jorcano, Amalia Ruiz, Giacomo Reina, Cristina Martín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nanoscience Au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea FerrerasDepartment of Bioengineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés 28911, Spain.
Ana MatesanzDepartment of Electronic Technology, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés 28911, Spain.
Jabier MendizabalDomotek ingeniería prototipado y formación S.L., San Sebastián 20003, Spain.
Koldo ArtolaDomotek ingeniería prototipado y formación S.L., San Sebastián 20003, Spain.
Yuta NishinaGraduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4958-1753
Pablo AcedoDepartment of Electronic Technology, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés 28911, Spain.
José L JorcanoDepartment of Bioengineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés 28911, Spain.
Amalia RuizInstitute of Cancer Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, United Kingdom.
Giacomo ReinaEmpa Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen 9014, Switzerland.
Cristina MartínDepartment of Bioengineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés 28911, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5670-3328

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the continuous development of advanced bioprinting technologies is under fervent study, enhancing the regenerative potential of hydrogel-based constructs using external stimuli for wound dressing has yet to be tackled. Fibroblasts play a significant role in wound healing and tissue implants at different stages, including extracellular matrix production, collagen synthesis, and wound and tissue remodeling. This study explores the synergistic interplay between photothermal activity and nanomaterial-mediated cell proliferation. The use of different graphene-based materials (GBM) in the development of photoactive bioinks is investigated. In particular, we report the creation of a skin-inspired dressing for wound healing and regenerative medicine. Three distinct GBM, namely, graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and graphene platelets (GP), were rigorously characterized, and their photothermal capabilities were elucidated. Our investigations revealed that rGO exhibited the highest photothermal efficiency and antibacterial properties when irradiated, even at a concentration as low as 0.05 mg/mL, without compromising human fibroblast viability. Alginate-based bioinks alongside human fibroblasts were employed for the bioprinting with rGO. The scaffold did not affect the survival of fibroblasts for 3 days after bioprinting, as cell viability was not affected. Remarkably, the inclusion of rGO did not compromise the printability of the hydrogel, ensuring the successful fabrication of complex constructs. Furthermore, the presence of rGO in the final scaffold continued to provide the benefits of photothermal antimicrobial therapy without detrimentally affecting fibroblast growth. This outcome underscores the potential of rGO-enhanced hydrogels in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Our findings hold promise for developing game-changer strategies in 4D bioprinting to create smart and functional tissue constructs with high fibroblast proliferation and promising therapeutic capabilities in drug delivery and bactericidal skin-inspired dressings.

Identifiers

PMID39184835
PMCPMC11342345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.