ReviewCureus2024
The Rise of Digital Twins in Healthcare: A Mapping of the Research Landscape.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Revolutionizing personalized medicine using artificial intelligence: a meta-analysis of predictive diagnostics and their impacts on drug development.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Next-Gen Healthcare Devices: Evolution of MEMS and BioMEMS in the Era of the Internet of Bodies for Personalized Medicine.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Exploring the Potential of Digital Twins in Cancer Treatment: A Narrative Review of Reviews.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Harnessing the AI/ML in Drug and Biological Products Discovery and Development: The Regulatory Perspective.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The place of digital twin technology in any healthcare system is a truly disruptive innovation that has profound consequences all across medical research and practice. Digital twins represent the virtual replicas that correspond to some physical entity by pulling real-time data streams from different sources to model biological systems for health monitoring and personalization of treatment strategies. This paper presents a detailed review of the current research landscape into digital twins for healthcare. Through bibliometric analysis, we obtained 1,663 publications from 2012 to 2024, basically sourced from the Scopus database, establishing a portion of the trends, productive authors, influential sources, and collaboration networks in this fast-evolving field. Descriptively, our results indicate that although research into this area started way back, the bulk of research began to be realized from 2018 onwards, with appreciable contributions coming in from interdisciplinary fields of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics. Even with challenges to data interoperability and other privacy concerns, this change brought on by digital twin technology is undoubtedly a considerable promise for chronic disease management, predictive analytics, drug discovery, and surgical planning. This work brings immense insight into this new domain of digital twins in health, which shall set up a strong foundation for future research and innovation in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.