ReviewCureus2024
The Impact of Hormonal Contraceptives on the Incidence and Progression of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elevated cardiovascular risk associated with hormone replacement therapy: A comprehensive analysis of reproductive factors and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease outcomes in the UK Biobank cohort.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Cardiovascular Safety of Hormonal Contraception: Method-Specific Risks and Clinical Implications.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cardiometabolic, Glycaemic, and Metabolic Safety of Hormonal Contraceptives in Women with Medical Conditions: A Systematic Review.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Stroke and myocardial infarction with contemporary hormonal contraception: real-world, nationwide, prospective cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review examines the impact of hormonal contraceptives on the incidence and progression of cardiovascular diseases in women. We analyzed 14 high-quality studies published between 1998 and 2018, including meta-analyses, cohort studies, case-control studies, and systematic reviews. The aim was to synthesize the current understanding of the relationship between various hormonal contraceptives and cardiovascular risks, focusing on outcomes such as venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction. The 14 selected studies represent a comprehensive and diverse body of evidence, allowing for a nuanced analysis of the topic. Our findings indicate that combined oral contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, with the magnitude of risk varying based on estrogen dose, progestogen type, and individual risk factors. The review of these studies highlights the importance of personalized risk assessment in contraceptive counseling and prescribing practices. By synthesizing data from these key studies, we provide a consolidated view of the current state of knowledge regarding hormonal contraceptives and cardiovascular health, offering valuable insights for both clinicians and researchers in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.