ArticleCureus2024
Screening for Pelvic Floor Disorders and Sexual Dysfunction in Postpartum Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives This study assesses the screen rate and prevalence of postpartum pelvic floor disorders and sexual dysfunction (PFDs/SD) within the first year of delivery. Methods This is a retrospective review of postpartum women seen in a university clinic who delivered at the associated hospital and had postpartum visits from June 1, 2020, to April 15, 2022. Charts were reviewed from delivery to one year postpartum. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between women with and without postpartum screening. Results Three hundred thirty-four women met inclusion criteria. Two hundred twenty (65.9%) were screened for PFDs/SD. Compared to women who were not screened, women who were screened were older (32.6 vs 31.3 years, p=0.02). Women with a cesarean delivery (73% vs. 58% vaginal, p=0.004), delivered by an attending or resident (70% vs 60% midwife, p=0.06), first postpartum visit at less than six weeks after delivery (76% vs. 43% 6-12 weeks, p<0.001), and three or more postpartum visits (80% vs. 65% two visits, 50% one visit, p<0.001) were more likely to be screened. In an adjusted model, only timing of the first postpartum visit remained significant. Urinary incontinence and fecal incontinence were the most common PFDs diagnosed. Of the 41 women who had PFDs and/or SD, 31 (75.6%) were referred to pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) and/or urogynecology. Discussion In this retrospective cohort study, we found a low rate of postpartum screening for PFDs/SDs. This deficiency highlights critical gaps in care for postpartum women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.