Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184740›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Screening for Pelvic Floor Disorders and Sexual Dysfunction in Postpartum Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Simone R Fertel, Alyssa Clare, Jean P Tanner, Katie Propst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simone R FertelUrogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, USF (University of South Florida) Health, Tampa, USA.
Alyssa ClareMedicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA.
Jean P TannerPublic Health, USF (University of South Florida) Health, Tampa, USA.
Katie PropstUrogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, USF (University of South Florida) Health, Tampa, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives This study assesses the screen rate and prevalence of postpartum pelvic floor disorders and sexual dysfunction (PFDs/SD) within the first year of delivery. Methods This is a retrospective review of postpartum women seen in a university clinic who delivered at the associated hospital and had postpartum visits from June 1, 2020, to April 15, 2022. Charts were reviewed from delivery to one year postpartum. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between women with and without postpartum screening. Results Three hundred thirty-four women met inclusion criteria. Two hundred twenty (65.9%) were screened for PFDs/SD. Compared to women who were not screened, women who were screened were older (32.6 vs 31.3 years, p=0.02). Women with a cesarean delivery (73% vs. 58% vaginal, p=0.004), delivered by an attending or resident (70% vs 60% midwife, p=0.06), first postpartum visit at less than six weeks after delivery (76% vs. 43% 6-12 weeks, p<0.001), and three or more postpartum visits (80% vs. 65% two visits, 50% one visit, p<0.001) were more likely to be screened. In an adjusted model, only timing of the first postpartum visit remained significant. Urinary incontinence and fecal incontinence were the most common PFDs diagnosed. Of the 41 women who had PFDs and/or SD, 31 (75.6%) were referred to pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) and/or urogynecology. Discussion In this retrospective cohort study, we found a low rate of postpartum screening for PFDs/SDs. This deficiency highlights critical gaps in care for postpartum women.

Indexed as

female sexual healthgynecologypelvic floor disorderpostpartum carepreventative health care visitsurogynaecology

Identifiers

PMID39184740
PMCPMC11343690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.