ArticleCureus2024
Age Estimation Using the Pulp-to-Tooth Area Ratio in an Indian Population Using Cone-Beam Computerised Tomography (CBCT): A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Age estimation based on pulp/tooth volume ratio using CBCT: a study on mandibular canines.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAge estimation, whether for living or deceased individuals, is crucial in forensic sciences. Traditionally, the pulp-to-tooth area ratio determined from periapical radiographs has been employed as a non-invasive method for estimating age. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) represents a newer technique, providing three-dimensional images of teeth in living individuals.
aimThis study aims to estimate age using the pulp-to-tooth area ratio of four teeth (the permanent maxillary central incisor, lateral incisor, canine, and first premolar. STUDY
designThe study included ninety subjects ranging in age from 18 to 70 years.
conclusionThis study concluded that the correlation between actual age and estimated age varied across different tooth types. There was a strong positive correlation between the maxillary right central incisor and maxillary right canine tooth, while the maxillary left canine tooth exhibited a slightly weaker but still positive correlation. This indicates that the maxillary right central incisor and maxillary right canine tooth are the most reliable for estimating age. Additionally, the study found that the linear regression results for estimating age based on the pulp-to-tooth area ratio, categorised by sex and each type of tooth, showed strong associations between age and the ratio for the maxillary left central incisor and maxillary left canine teeth in males, and for the maxillary left central incisor in females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.