ReviewCureus2024
Comparing Surgical, Acupuncture, and Exercise Interventions for Improving the Quality of Life in Women With Endometriosis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient characteristics and lifestyle determinants of quality of life among women with endometriosis: a systematic review.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Pooled it
- Emerging Non-Pharmacological Approaches in Endometriosis: Mechanistic Insights into Phototherapy, Hyperthermia, and Acupuncture-Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine Retention Enema for Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Precision Therapeutic and Preventive Molecular Strategies for Endometriosis-Associated Infertility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly impacts the quality of life (QoL) of affected women. This systematic review aimed to compare the effects of surgical interventions, acupuncture, and exercise programs on the QoL in women with endometriosis. A comprehensive search was conducted in databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating the impact of these interventions on the QoL were included. The review identified 10 studies (six RCTs and four observational studies) involving a total of 493 participants. Surgical interventions, particularly the laparoscopic excision of endometriotic lesions, demonstrated substantial reductions in pain and improvements in the QoL. Acupuncture effectively alleviated pain and enhanced overall well-being. Exercise programs improved the QoL, physical function, and pain reduction. The findings suggest that surgical-, acupuncture-, and exercise-based approaches can significantly improve the QoL for women with endometriosis. However, more personalized treatment approaches and further research are needed to understand the long-term benefits, optimal protocols, and underlying mechanisms of these interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.