Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184685›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Online Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experience and Perception of Second-Year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) Students in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Assam, India.

Pranab Das, Dolly Roy, Nivedita Saha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pranab DasDepartment of Pharmacology, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Silchar, IND.
Dolly RoyDepartment of Pharmacology, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Silchar, IND.
Nivedita SahaDepartment of Pharmacology, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Silchar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction  The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic-imposed changes in educational practices worldwide. It forced medical institutions to adapt to an online teaching mode, which has advantages and disadvantages. The present study aims to investigate the perceptions of medical students regarding online learning during COVID-19. Purpose This study assesses whether online teaching methods are feasible, suitable, preferred, and effective compared to traditional in-class teaching for Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students. Methodology It is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted on 120 second-year MBBS students of Silchar Medical College, Silchar, India. Using Google Forms, a closed-ended pre-formed questionnaire was distributed to the students to get feedback on the advantages and challenges of online learning. The respondents were prompted to respond to the questions on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. The data were analyzed using Excel 16 (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA). Results The majority of the participants positively supported the feasibility, suitability, utility, and effectiveness of online learning. The most preferred online web conferencing platform for e-learning in the survey was Google Classroom. Despite the advantages, online medical education was limited by network-related issues and a lack of socializing with peers. Moreover, looking forward, about 90% of the students preferred online or a combination of online and classroom teaching. Conclusion The study highlights the positive attitude toward online education among second-year MBBS Students in a tertiary care hospital in Assam. It provides valuable insights into the challenges faced in e-learning in medical education, forming the groundwork for devising future education strategies.

Indexed as

covid-19 pandemice-learninginformation technologymedical educationonline learning

Identifiers

PMID39184685
PMCPMC11344871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.