Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184680›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Safety and Efficacy of Oral Mifepristone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor.

Pratap Pharande, Ananya R Kiran, Shivani Patel, Hada V Vanrajsinh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pratap PharandeObstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.
Ananya R KiranObstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.
Shivani PatelObstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.
Hada V VanrajsinhObstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Labor induction, a common practice to prevent maternal and fetal complications from prolonged labor, involves stimulating contractions before they begin naturally. This can be achieved through medications, mechanical methods, or surgical interventions. Cervical ripening is crucial for successful delivery. When the cervix is not sufficiently ripe, drugs are often used to augment this process chemically. Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of mifepristone for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Method A sample size of 200 was used in this single-blind randomized control trial. Primarily, pregnant women with term pregnancies, Bishop scores <6, and cephalic fetal presentation were included in the study. The study population was randomly divided into test and control groups. The test group (n=100) was administered 200 mg of mifepristone orally, while the control group (n=100) received a placebo. The Bishop score was reassessed 24 hours after mifepristone administration. Patients were taken for labor induction if their Bishop score was >6. For individuals with a Bishop score of <6, 1 mg of dinoprostone gel was administered intracervically once every six hours. Safety and efficacy were assessed by analyzing several parameters associated with labor progression, maternal outcomes, and fetal outcomes. Results The mean age of patients in the test group was 26±4.5 years, while in the control group, it was 26±5 years. The induction-to-delivery interval was notably shorter in the test group (18.8±2.3 hours) than in the control group (19.24±1.8 hours, p<0.0001). After the administration of 200 mg mifepristone, the mean Bishop score in the test group was 5.74±0.8, compared to 5.13±0.76 in the control group. The increase in the Bishop score after mifepristone treatment was significantly higher in the test group than in the control group (p-value=0.013). In the study, 73 (73%) patients in the test group had a normal vaginal delivery (NVD), whereas NVD accounted for 64 (64%) patients in the control group. Instrumental deliveries were less frequent in the test group, accounting for 14 (14%) patients, compared to 16 (16%) patients in the control group. The frequency of lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) was also lower in the mifepristone-treated group at 13 (13%) compared to the control group at 20 (20%). Fetal distress in five (38%) patients and non-progression of labor in 11 (55%) patients were the most frequent indications for LSCS in the test and control groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in neonatal outcomes between the test and control groups. Meconium-stained liquor was the most frequent complication in both the test group (10, 10%) and the control group (5, or 5%). Conclusion Administration of mifepristone effectively increased the Bishop scores and reduced the induction-to-delivery interval compared to controls, highlighting its potential as a cervical ripening agent.

Indexed as

bishop scoredilatation of cervixlabor augmentationmifepristoneuterine contraction

Identifiers

PMID39184680
PMCPMC11344620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.