Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184663›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Erector Spinae Plane Block in Post-thoracotomy Pain Management: A Case Series.

Afnan Amjad, Faraz Mansoor

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Epidurals in esophagectomy: end of an era?Journal of thoracic disease · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. [Epidural Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Evidence and Practice].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Afnan AmjadAnesthesia and Critical Care, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar, PAK.
Faraz MansoorAnesthesia and Critical Care, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-thoracotomy pain management remains challenging, with thoracic epidurals traditionally considered the gold standard. Erector spinae plane blocks have emerged as a potential alternative, offering simplicity and a favorable safety profile. This case series presents three patients undergoing a hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy who received erector spinae plane blocks for postoperative analgesia. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane catheters were inserted pre-anesthesia, with infusions managed postoperatively based on individual pain scores. All patients achieved effective pain control, enabling early mobilization. This suggests erector spinae plane blocks as a viable option for post-thoracotomy pain management.

Indexed as

erector spinae plane blockesophagectomypost-thoracotomy pain managementregional anesthesiaultrasound-guided catheter placement

Identifiers

PMID39184663
PMCPMC11344624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.