ArticleCureus2024
Comparing the Efficacy of 3% NaCl With Pressure Dressing and Oral Glycopyrrolate With Pressure Dressing in the Treatment of Parotid Sialocele in Postoperative Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Parotid sialocele is a common complication following surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), leading to discomfort and potential complications. Various treatment modalities have been proposed, including 3% NaCl with pressure dressing and oral glycopyrrolate with pressure dressing, yet evidence comparing their efficacy is limited. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy of 3% NaCl with pressure dressing and oral glycopyrrolate with pressure dressing in the treatment of parotid sialocele among postoperative OSCC patients undergoing neck dissection. Material and methods Patients diagnosed with OSCC undergoing surgical intervention resulting in parotid sialocele will be randomly assigned to receive either 3% NaCl with pressure dressing or oral glycopyrrolate with pressure dressing. Treatment efficacy will be assessed based on the discharge of any serous collection from the suture line, the length of time required for resolution of salivary sialocele, wound dehiscence, the length of the postoperative stay, the amount of time to resume oral feeds, and the timing of postoperative adjuvant therapy. Results This is an ongoing study protocol, and we are expecting the analysis of the results in 2026. Conclusion This randomized controlled trial will furnish invaluable insights into the comparative efficacy of 3% NaCl with pressure dressing and oral glycopyrrolate with pressure dressing in the treatment of parotid sialocele among postoperative OSCC patients. The findings will inform evidence-based decision-making and optimize treatment strategies for this common complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.