ArticleCureus2024
Comparative Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography vs. Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography With Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Stenting in Evaluating Obstructive Jaundice: A Prospective Study in South India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Obstructive jaundice due to proximal biliary obstruction presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Accurate and timely diagnosis is essential for effective management. Objective/aim This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) along with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) stenting in obstructive jaundice, while also incorporating the comparison of ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography (CT) findings. Materials and methods A prospective study was conducted at a tertiary healthcare center in South India from January 2020 to June 2022. Comprehensive diagnostic evaluations were performed using USG, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), MRCP, and PTC. The diagnostic outcomes from USG and CECT were initially assessed, followed by MRCP for every patient. These results were then compared with PTC, focusing on identifying the causes and levels of biliary obstruction. Results Fifty patients with suspected obstructive jaundice were included in the study. The study predominantly involved patients aged between the fourth and eighth decades (80%). Choledocholithiasis was identified as the leading cause (30%). MRCP demonstrated superior sensitivity in identifying both the cause (80%) and level (88%) of obstruction. It was particularly effective in detecting hilar masses with 100% sensitivity. Conversely, PTC, while less sensitive in detection, offered the advantage of simultaneous therapeutic intervention through stenting, with a sensitivity rate of 93% in detecting hilar masses. Conclusion MRCP outperforms PTC in diagnostic sensitivity for obstructive jaundice caused by proximal biliary obstruction. However, the advantage of PTC lies in its capacity for immediate therapeutic intervention via stent placement, addressing both diagnostic and treatment needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.