Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184625›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Management of Mild Postpartum Anemia: Is Iron Administration Effective?

Akihito Morita, Daisuke Higeta, Yoshikazu Kitahara, Maki Inoue, Akira Iwase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akihito MoritaObstetrics and Gynecology, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, JPN.
Daisuke HigetaObstetrics and Gynecology, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, JPN.
Yoshikazu KitaharaObstetrics and Gynecology, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, JPN.
Maki InoueObstetrics and Gynecology, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, JPN.
Akira IwaseObstetrics and Gynecology, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of iron therapy in the treatment of mild postpartum anemia. Methods We conducted a case-control study involving women who underwent cesarean section at our hospital between 2015 and 2020. Following propensity score matching, participants were categorized into two groups based on whether or not they received iron therapy. These patients were evaluated for mean hemoglobin (Hb) levels on the seventh postoperative day (POD 7), the percentage of subjects achieving Hb greater than 10 g/dL on POD 7, and the incidence of adverse events. The efficacy of iron administration was evaluated using a superiority test, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were employed to generate area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC). Results The mean Hb level on POD 7 was 10.12 g/dL in the iron group and 9.89 g/dL in the iron-free group (P = 0.206). The superiority test revealed that the percentage of subjects achieving Hb levels greater than 10 g/dL on POD 7 was 56.1% in the iron group and 48.8% in the iron-free group (P = 0.880), indicating that the iron group did not demonstrate superiority over the iron-free group. The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the iron group (P = 0.027). The highest AUROC was observed with preoperative mean corpuscular Hb, measuring 0.632 (95% CI: 0.509-0.755), with a cutoff point of 28.5 pg. Conclusion Consideration should be given to the uniform administration of iron for the management of mild postpartum anemia.

Indexed as

anemiacesarean sectionhemoglobiniron therapypostpartum

Identifiers

PMID39184625
PMCPMC11343339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.