ArticleCureus2024
Effects of Different Agents of the Lubrication of i-gel Airway on the Incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimThe aim of this study is to compare the effect of different lubricating agents used with the i-gel® laryngeal mask airway on the incidence of postoperative sore throat. MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter obtaining institutional ethics approval, this prospective trial was conducted on 150 patients who were scheduled for minor surgical procedures. The study population was placed in three groups of 50 each, after randomization with computer-generated random numbers, based on the lubricant used (Group LJ: with lignocaine jelly as the lubricant, Group WJ: with water-based jelly as a lubricant, Group NS: with 0.9% normal saline as a lubricant). The time taken to secure the airway (from insertion to the first end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO
resultsAll three groups were comparable in terms of demography (p > 0.05). The time taken to insertion, number of attempts and securing of the airway were also comparable amongst the three groups (p > 0.05). Blood staining during LMA removal was comparable between the three groups (p > 0.05). In the postoperative period, sore throat was comparable between the three groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of hoarseness of voice in the postoperative period however was more significant in Group LJ when compared to the other two (p < 0.05). Postoperative swallowing discomfort was also significantly higher in Group LJ than in the other two groups (p < 0.05).
conclusionWe conclude that lignocaine jelly, water-based jelly and normal saline used as lubricating agents on the i-gel airway did not show a difference in the incidence of postoperative sore throat. Lignocaine jelly was associated with a higher incidence of hoarseness of voice and swallowing discomfort when compared to the other lubricants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.