ArticleCureus2024
Feasibility of Holographic Team Training Simulation: An Information Technology (IT) Perspective for Healthcare and Educational Institutions.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction This study examines the feasibility and practicality of holographic display technology (HDT) in health professions education from an information technology (IT) support staff perspective. Considering a lack of feasibility studies for introducing newer technologies, it focuses on feasibility's acceptance and practicality dimensions during a simulation-based team training workshop. Method A multimethod design feasibility study assessed the acceptability and practicality of HDT for the IT staff through a Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)-based survey and a focus group discussion after a team training simulation workshop. Results Quantitative results showed a reliability coefficient (α=0.83) and a positive correlation between facilitating conditions (FC) and effort expectancy (EE), self-efficacy (SE) and social influence (SI), SI and attitude toward technology (AT), SE and attitude to use, and behavioral intention (BI) and EE. Negative correlations included SE and performance expectancy (PE), comfort with technology and FC, comfort and anxiety, and attitude to use and experience. Qualitative findings yielded four key themes from the focus group discussions that corroborated the quantitative findings. Discussion The study findings highlight the promising potential for HDT feasibility in educational settings. Future research should extend to diverse contexts to validate these preliminary findings and explore broader educational applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.