Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184582›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Efficient online detection device and method for cottonseed breakage based on Light-YOLO.

Hongzhou Zhang, Qingxu Li, Zhenwei Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hongzhou ZhangCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Alar, China.
Qingxu LiInstitute of Cotton Engineering, Anhui University of Finance & Economics, Bengbu, China.
Zhenwei LuoCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Alar, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality cottonseed is essential for successful cotton production. The integrity of cottonseed hulls plays a pivotal role in fostering the germination and growth of cotton plants. Consequently, it is crucial to eliminate broken cottonseeds before the cotton planting process. Regrettably, there is a lack of rapid and cost-effective methods for detecting broken cottonseed at this critical stage. To address this issue, this study developed a dual-camera system for acquiring front and back images of multiple cottonseeds. Based on this system, we designed the hardware, software, and control systems required for the online detection of cottonseed breakage. Moreover, to enhance the performance of cottonseed breakage detection, we improved the backbone and YOLO head of YOLOV8m by incorporating MobileOne-block and GhostConv, resulting in Light-YOLO. Light-YOLO achieved detection metrics of 93.8% precision, 97.2% recall, 98.9% mAP50, and 96.1% accuracy for detecting cottonseed breakage, with a compact model size of 41.3 MB. In comparison, YOLOV8m reported metrics of 93.7% precision, 95.0% recall, 99.0% mAP50, and 95.2% accuracy, with a larger model size of 49.6 MB. To further validate the performance of the online detection device and Light-YOLO, this study conducted an online validation experiment, which resulted in a detection accuracy of 86.7% for cottonseed breakage information. The results demonstrate that Light-YOLO exhibits superior detection performance and faster speed compared to YOLOV8m, confirming the feasibility of the online detection technology proposed in this study. This technology provides an effective method for sorting broken cottonseeds.

Indexed as

breakagecottonseedLight-YOLOonline detectionYOLOV8m

Identifiers

PMID39184582
PMCPMC11341483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.