Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184571›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Establishing large mammal population trends from heterogeneous count data.

R Pradel, P-C Renaud, O Pays, P Scholte, J O Ogutu, F Hibert, N Casajus, F Mialhe, H Fritz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R PradelCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2684-9251
P-C RenaudSustainability Research Unit, Faculty of Science, George Campus Nelson Mandela University George South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1776-4923
O PaysUniv Angers, BIODIVAG Angers France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-1804
P ScholteGerman Development Cooperation (GIZ) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3813-7363
J O OgutuBiostatistics Unit, Institute of Crop Science University of Hohenheim Stuttgart Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7379-0387
F HibertUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558 Villeurbanne France.
N CasajusFRB-CESAB Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5537-5294
F MialheDepartment of Geography, CNRS 5600 EVS University Lumière Lyon 2 Bron France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5845-895X
H FritzSustainability Research Unit, Faculty of Science, George Campus Nelson Mandela University George South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7106-3661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring population trends is pivotal to effective wildlife conservation and management. However, wildlife managers often face many challenges when analyzing time series of census data due to heterogeneities in sampling methodology, strategy, or frequency. We present a three-step method for modeling trends from time series of count data obtained through multiple census methods (aerial or ground census and expert estimates). First, we design a heuristic for constructing credible intervals for all types of animal counts including those which come with no precision measure. Then, we define conversion factors for rendering aerial and ground counts comparable and provide values for broad classes of animals from an extant series of parallel aerial and ground censuses. Lastly, we construct a Bayesian model that takes the reconciled counts as input and estimates the relative growth rates between successive dates while accounting for their precisions. Importantly, we bound the rate of increase to account for the demographic potential of a species. We propose a flow chart for constructing credible intervals for various types of animal counts. We provide estimates of conversion factors for 5 broad classes of species. We describe the Bayesian model for calculating trends, annual rates of population increase, and the associated credible intervals. We develop a bespoke R CRAN package, popbayes, for implementing all the calculations that take the raw counts as input. It produces consistent and reliable estimates of population trends and annual rates of increase. Several examples from real populations of large African mammals illustrate the different features of our method. The approach is well-suited for analyzing population trends for heterogeneous time series and allows a principled use of all the available historical census data. The method is general and flexible and applicable to various other animal species besides African large mammals. It can readily be adapted to test predictions of various hypotheses about drivers of rates of population increase.

Indexed as

Bayesian modelingheterogeneous wildlife censusespartial countspopbayes R packagepopulation rate of increasepopulation trendrelative growth ratetotal countswildlife management and conservation

Identifiers

PMID39184571
PMCPMC11341276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.