Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184539›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Perspectives: Comparison of Deep Learning Segmentation Models on Biophysical and Biomedical Data.

J Shepard Bryan Iv, Pedro Pessoa, Meyam Tavakoli, Steve Presse

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J Shepard Bryan Iv
Pedro Pessoa
Meyam Tavakoli
Steve Presse

Funding

Toward high spatiotemporal resolution models of single molecules for in vivo applicationsR35GM148237 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Steve Presse · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
A Bayesian nonparametric approach to superresolved tracking of multiple molecules inside living cellsR01GM130745 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PRESSE, STEVE · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
Theoretical Models of Single Molecule Dynamics from Minimal Photon NumbersR01GM134426 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PRESSE, STEVE · 2019 to 2022
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130745NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134426NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning based approaches are now widely used across biophysics to help automate a variety of tasks including image segmentation, feature selection, and deconvolution. However, the presence of multiple competing deep learning architectures, each with its own unique advantages and disadvantages, makes it challenging to select an architecture best suited for a specific application. As such, we present a comprehensive comparison of common models. Here, we focus on the task of segmentation assuming the typically small training dataset sizes available from biophysics experiments and compare the following four commonly used architectures: convolutional neural networks, U-Nets, vision transformers, and vision state space models. In doing so, we establish criteria for determining optimal conditions under which each model excels, thereby offering practical guidelines for researchers and practitioners in the field.

Identifiers

PMID39184539
PMCPMC11343239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.