ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2024
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a First Aid Training Programme for Individuals Without a Background in Medical Education.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in knowledge and attitude after community-based first-aid training: a prospective study with a 12-month follow-up.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- First aid awareness among non-medical staff of armed forces hospitals in Taif region.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of health education on first aid with the provision of first aid kits among rural households of India: A quasi-experimental study.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Navigating Vaccine Misinformation: Assessing Newly Licensed Physicians' Ability to Distinguish Facts from Fake News.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- First Aid Training for Non-Medical Professionals: The Need for Comprehensive Assessments [Letter].Advances in medical education and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: People without a medical education background who have the skills and knowledge to provide emergency care can be useful in emergencies, disasters, earthquakes, and pandemics to save or support the life of an injured person until hospitalization or the arrival of an emergency medical team. The purpose of the study is to assess the knowledge and skills of first aid in individuals without a medical education background within a year after training. Materials and Methods: The study sample included 643 people without a medical education background. The study participants attended basic first aid training, the sessions that lasted for 18 hours. Participants answered a 10-question skills test before and after completing the course, as well as 6 months and 1 year after training. SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Ireland Product Distribution Limited, Ireland) was used for the statistical assessment of data, employing Cochran's Q test. Pairwise comparisons were made between different periods using the Wilcoxon test with Bonferroni correction. Results: The mean age of the participants was 36 for males, and 42 for females. In the sample, males accounted for 70% (n = 441) and females for 30% (n = 202). The first aid training provided to persons without a medical education background significantly increased their level of knowledge. After 6 and 12 months, their knowledge and abilities remained significantly higher than before the training. However, these results were lower than they had been immediately after training. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that first aid training significantly increased the knowledge level of non-medical individuals immediately after training and remained elevated after 6 and 12 months. However, there was a decline in the level of knowledge and skills over time, indicating the need for refresher training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.