ArticleACS omega2024
Cold Plasma for the Modification of the Surface Roughness of Microparticles.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Possible Applications of Cold Atmospheric Plasma in Otorhinolaryngology: A Narrative Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in Polymer Film and Coating Technologies for Enhanced Surface Functionality.Polymers · 2026Review
- Plasma-Engineered PDRN: Surface Charge Neutralization and Nanosizing Enhance Uptake and Regeneration Potential.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cold plasma treatment is commonly used for sterilization. However, another potential of cold plasma treatment is surface modification. To date, several efforts have been directed toward investigating the effect of cold plasma treatment in modifying the surfaces of films. Here, the impact of suspension properties and parameters of cold plasma treatment on the changes of surfaces of monodisperse polymeric microparticles is tested. The plasma treatment did not touch the surface chemistry of the monodisperse polymeric microparticles. The concentration of suspensions of 1 mg/mL was determined to relate to a stronger effect of the plasma treatment on the roughness of the microparticles. Microparticles with an average diameter of 20 μm show a roughness increase with the plasma treatment time. However, a plasma treatment time longer than 15 min damages the microparticles, as observed in particles with an average diameter of 20 and 50 μm. We finally prototyped monodisperse microparticles to deliver drugs to the nasal mucosa by studying the effect of roughness in their (undesired) self-adhesion and (desired) adhesion with tissue. A moderate roughness, with an average peak-to-valley distance of 500 nm, appears to be the most effective in reducing the detachment forces with nasal tissue by up to 5 mN.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.