ArticleAnnals of maxillofacial surgery
Decannulation Dilemmas - Timing Tracheostomy Tube Removal in Children with Craniofacial Deformities - A Retrospective Study.
Article in Annals of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tracheostomy in Children: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in South India.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tracheostomy decannulation in children with craniofacial deformities poses challenges due to airway obstruction and the developing brain. This study aimed to compare decannulation outcomes based on age at tracheostomy and duration of cannulation so as to identify the best time for decannulation for children with long-term tracheostomy. Methods: This retrospective study included 12 children at a single centre who underwent decannulation after prolonged tracheostomy for craniofacial deformities. Data on demographics, clinical features, decannulation process and outcomes were collected. Children were divided into two groups: ≤6 years ( Results: All children underwent successful decannulation without immediate complications. One case of mild tracheomalacia and one of subglottic stenosis were treated pre-decannulation. Children ≤6 years demonstrated better post-operative adaptation in swallowing and speaking compared to the >6 years group. Notably, early and prolonged tracheostomy in the ≤6 years group was associated with easier adaptation post-decannulation. Social interaction was another challenge, particularly for the >6 years group. Discussion: The timing and duration of tracheostomy significantly impacts post-decannulation adaptation, likely due to factors such as neuroplasticity, muscle memory and psychological adjustment. This emphasises the need for comprehensive care, especially for older children. Early tracheostomy in children may allow them to adapt speech and swallowing skills, easing post-decannulation regain of skills. Conversely, older children with fully developed skills may struggle to relearn them after tracheostomy and decannulation. Age at tracheostomy and duration of cannulation influences decannulation outcomes in children with craniofacial deformities. Further research is crucial to develop targeted interventions for better post-operative care, particularly for older children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.