Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184387›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Polyandry contributes to

Murilo Fonseca Ribeiro, Gabriela Cavallini, Gabriel Negri Solce, Ana Laura Favoreto, José Raimundo De Souza Passos, Brett Hurley, Carlos Frederico Wilcken

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Cold storage ofPeerJ · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Murilo Fonseca RibeiroInstituto de Pesquisas e Estudos Florestais, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1909-8709
Gabriela CavalliniDepartamento de Proteção Vegetal/Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriel Negri SolceDepartamento de Proteção Vegetal/Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Laura FavoretoDepartamento de Proteção Vegetal/Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Raimundo De Souza PassosDepartamento de Biodiversidade e Bioestatística/Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Brett HurleyDepartment of Zoology and Entomology/Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
Carlos Frederico WilckenDepartamento de Proteção Vegetal/Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9875-4158

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Programa Cooperativo sobre Proteção Florestal (PROTEF) of the Instituto de Pesquisas e Estudos Florestais (IPEF)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: Reproductive parameters were compared between three treatments: monoandry, where the female was allowed to mate daily with the same male; no choice polyandry, where the female was allowed to mate daily with a different male; and polyandry with choice, where the female was allowed to mate daily, but with a choice between five different males. Another experiment varying the density of males was conducted to evaluate the effect of male harassment. Results: Polyandry with choice resulted in the longest period of oviposition, highest fecundity and highest number of eggs per egg capsules when compared to monoandrous females. No negative effect related to male harassment in the laboratory, such as decreased fertility, fecundity, or number of eggs per egg capsule, was detected. Conclusion: Polyandry contributes to mass rearing as it increases fecundity and oviposition period on females and there is no evidence of male harassment on

Indexed as

FertilityOvipositionSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMalePest Control, BiologicalReproductionWeevilsBiological controlEucalyptus snout-beetleFecundityFertilityForest entomologyMale harassmentMonogamyPolyandry

Identifiers

PMID39184387
PMCPMC11344996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.