ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2024
Abusive Pediatric Burns Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP).
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical Child Abuse Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP).MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- Abusive Bruising and Cutaneous Mimics Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP).MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
- Integrating Gamification and Flipped Classroom Strategies in Medical Education: A Classroom Action Research on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
- Abusive Head Trauma Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP): Rehma's Story.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Child abuse pediatrics is an underrepresented area of medical education. To date, the available teaching materials about child abuse in Methods: The abusive pediatric burns module was presented to a hybrid audience at a 45-minute emergency medicine grand rounds at Mayo Clinic. Participants completed a pre- and postmodule assessment to measure their confidence and knowledge pertaining to abusive pediatric burns. Results: Fifty-six attendees, from an audience primarily composed of emergency medicine physicians but also including some multidisciplinary individuals, participated in the module. The median confidence level in assessing pediatric burns for abuse showed a modest increase from 4 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-6) to 6 (IQR: 5-8), and the proportion of participants answering knowledge questions correctly increased for every question: 18% versus 45%, 41% versus 100%, 59% versus 84%, and 72% versus 100%. Qualitative feedback from the audience was favorable. Discussion: This interactive, case-based module about abusive pediatric burns was successfully administered to an audience at emergency medicine grand rounds. Increases in confidence and knowledge were observed, and positive qualitative feedback was received.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.