ArticleACS measurement science au2024
Combating Prozone Effects and Predicting the Dynamic Range of Naked-Eye Nanoplasmonic Biosensors through Capture Bioentity Optimization.
Article in ACS measurement science au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal Confinements of Distance-Dependent Emitters for Enhancing Plasmonic Signals.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-supported, rapid, digital quantification of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately quantifying high analyte concentrations poses a challenge due to the common occurrence of the prozone or hook effect within sandwich assays utilized in plasmonic nanoparticle-based lateral flow devices (LFDs). As a result, LFDs are often underestimated compared to other biosensors with concerns surrounding their specificity and sensitivity toward the target analyte. To address this limitation, here we develop an analytical model capable of predicting the prozone effect and subsequently the dynamic range of the biosensor based on the concentration of the capture antibody. To support our model, we conduct a sandwich immunoassay to detect C-reactive protein (CRP) in a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer using an LFD. Within the experiment, we investigate the relationship between the CRP dynamic range and the prozone effect as a function of the capture antibody concentration, which is increased from 0.1 to 2 mg/mL. The experimental results, while supporting the developed analytical model, show that increasing the capture antibody concentration increases the dynamic range. The developed model therefore holds the potential to expand the measurable range and reduce costs associated with quantifying biomarkers in diverse diagnostic assays. This will ultimately allow LFDs to have better clinical significance before the prozone effect becomes dominant.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.