ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2024
Vulvo-vaginal stromal tumours - Case series of a rare entity from an oncology centre in India.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A case report and literature review: Diagnosis of pelvic retroperitoneal angiomyofibroblastoma assisted by next-generation sequencing.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vulvo-vaginal stromal tumours are a rare and diverse group of mesenchymal neoplasms unique to hormone-responsive stroma of the vulva and vagina. These tumours are mostly benign, except for the locally aggressive deep angiomyxomas. Often these tumours pose diagnostic challenges, resembling certain malignant vulvo vaginal tumours. This case series highlights clinicopathological features of four angiomyxomas; a single angiomyofibroblastoma, and another superficial myofibroblastoma, including their clinical outcomes. All patients were in their 4th or 5th decade of life. Only 1/4 angiomyxomas was correctly diagnosed at the referring hospitals. Three out of four patients harbouring angiomyxomas achieved clinical remission post-surgery, while one patient was lost to follow-up. By immunohistochemistry, tumor cells showed variable positivity for desmin, SMA, ER, and PR, and negativity for S100P and CD34. The angiomyofibroblastoma was initially misdiagnosed as a liposarcoma, and the patient was lost to follow-up after diagnosis. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were diffusely positive for SMA and ER; weakly and focally positive for desmin, and negative for AE1/AE3, CD34, and S100P. The patient with superficial myofibroblastoma is in clinical remission post-excision with an 18-month follow-up. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells showed CD34 positivity. Therapeutically, none of the patient received adjuvant treatment, except for a single patient with angiomyxoma, who underwent chemoradiation for a synchronous cancer cervix post-surgery. This case series provides valuable insights into the clinical heterogeneity, diagnostic intricacies, and outcomes of vulvo-vaginal stromal tumours from an oncology centre in India, further contributing to a better understanding of these rare tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.