Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184260›Full record

ReviewGynecology and minimally invasive therapy

The Progression and Prospects of the Gene Expression Profiling in Ovarian Epithelial Cancer.

Banushree Chandrasekhar Srinivasamurthy, Subhashini Ramamoorthi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Banushree Chandrasekhar SrinivasamurthyDepartment of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
Subhashini RamamoorthiDepartment of Pathology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common cancers with a high mortality rate among females worldwide. The understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease is highly important to provide personalized therapy to the patients. Ovarian cancer is as heterogeneous as colon and breast cancer which makes it difficult to treat. The development of gene signature is the only hope in providing targeted therapy to improve the survival of ovarian cancer patients. Malignant epithelial carcinomas are the most common cancers of the ovary with different histological and molecular subtypes and clinical behavior. The development of precursor lesions of ovarian carcinoma in the tubes and endometrium has provided a new dimension to the origin of ovarian cancers. The clinical utility of various gene signatures may not be logical unless validated. Validated gene signatures can aid the clinician in deciding the appropriate line of treatment.

Indexed as

Chemoresistancegene signaturehigh-grade serous carcinomaovarian cancerprognosisvalidation

Identifiers

PMID39184260
PMCPMC11343359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.