Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184256›Full record

ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy

Various Laparoscopic Techniques in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.

Antonette Ramos Pesebre, Masayoshi Nomura, Divina Yumul Soliza, Purim Ruanphoo, Moeko Kuriyama, Tomoka Obuchi, Mika Nagae, Shino Tokiwa, Kojiro Nishio, Tokumasa Hayashi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Management.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Antonette Ramos PesebreUrogynecology Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Masayoshi NomuraUrogynecology Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Divina Yumul SolizaUrogynecology Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Purim RuanphooUrogynecology Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Moeko KuriyamaUrogynecology Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Tomoka ObuchiUrogynecology Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Mika NagaeUrogynecology Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Shino TokiwaUrogynecology Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Kojiro NishioUrogynecology Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Tokumasa HayashiUrogynecology Center, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past, transvaginal surgery, native tissue restoration, or obliterative methods have been used in the majority of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgeries. Since laparoscopy has gained popularity, other procedures have been created to provide additional POP repair alternatives. Laparoscopic technique offers many advantages compared to open or transvaginal surgery when it comes to anatomical and surgical outcomes, recurrence rates, and patient's acceptance. Furthermore, we encouraged incorporating different laparoscopic techniques into urogynecology training to attract young gynecologists. Based on our own clinical and surgical experience, we present various laparoscopic techniques for treating POP. We think that by giving patients a variety of surgical alternatives, we can treat them all more effectively.

Indexed as

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexypelvic organ prolapsetransvaginal mesh surgery

Identifiers

PMID39184256
PMCPMC11343352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.