Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184060›Full record

ReviewEndoscopy international open2024

Green endoscopy, one step toward a sustainable future: Literature review.

Marcello Maida, Alessandro Vitello, Endrit Shahini, Roberto Vassallo, Emanuele Sinagra, Socrate Pallio, Giuseppinella Melita, Daryl Ramai, Marco Spadaccini, Cesare Hassan and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopy international open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Paving the way for green endoscopy in Saudi Arabia: A call for sustainable gastroenterology practice.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Green endoscopy: A review of strategies for sustainable practice.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Colon capsule endoscopy: Can it contribute to green endoscopy?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marcello MaidaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna 'Kore', Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4992-9289
Alessandro VitelloGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia Hospital, ASP di Caltanissetta, Caltanissetta, Italy.
Endrit ShahiniGastroenterology Unit, Istituto Nazionale di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Saverio de Bellis, Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Roberto VassalloGastroenterology Unit, Buccheri La Ferla Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
Emanuele SinagraGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Istituto San Raffaele G Giglio di Cefalù, Cefalu, Italy.
Socrate PallioDigestive Diseases Endoscopy Unit, Policlinico G. Martino Hospital, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giuseppinella MelitaDigestive Diseases Endoscopy Unit, Policlinico G. Martino Hospital, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Daryl RamaiGastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States.
Marco SpadacciniEndoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Cesare HassanEndoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7167-1459
Antonio FacciorussoGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-2156

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid climate change or climate crisis is one of the most serious emergencies of the 21st century, accounting for highly impactful and irreversible changes worldwide. Climate crisis can also affect the epidemiology and disease burden of gastrointestinal diseases because they have a connection with environmental factors and nutrition. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is a highly intensive procedure with a significant contribution to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Moreover, endoscopy is the third highest generator of waste in healthcare facilities with significant contributions to carbon footprint. The main sources of direct carbon emission in endoscopy are use of high-powered consumption devices (e.g. computers, anesthesia machines, wash machines for reprocessing, scope processors, and lighting) and waste production derived mainly from use of disposable devices. Indirect sources of emissions are those derived from heating and cooling of facilities, processing of histological samples, and transportation of patients and materials. Consequently, sustainable endoscopy and climate change have been the focus of discussions between endoscopy providers and professional societies with the aim of taking action to reduce environmental impact. The term "green endoscopy" refers to the practice of gastroenterology that aims to raise awareness, assess, and reduce endoscopy´s environmental impact. Nevertheless, while awareness has been growing, guidance about practical interventions to reduce the carbon footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy are lacking. This review aims to summarize current data regarding the impact of endoscopy on GHG emissions and possible strategies to mitigate this phenomenon. Further, we aim to promote the evolution of a more sustainable "green endoscopy".

Indexed as

Image and data processing, documentatitonPerformance and complicationsQuality and logistical aspectsQuality management

Identifiers

PMID39184060
PMCPMC11343619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.