Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184044›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Patients' perspectives on cancer care disparities in Central and Eastern European countries: experiencing taboos, misinformation and barriers in the healthcare system.

Veronica Coppini, Giulia Ferraris, Maria Vittoria Ferrari, Margherita Dahò, Iva Kirac, Ira Renko, Dario Monzani, Roberto Grasso, Gabriella Pravettoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Barrier resolution via patient navigation in the context of cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Veronica CoppiniApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Giulia FerrarisApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Maria Vittoria FerrariApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Margherita DahòDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement (SPPEFF), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Iva KiracGenetic Counseling Unit, University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ira RenkoGenetic Counseling Unit, University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dario MonzaniApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Roberto GrassoApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Gabriella PravettoniApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the advancements in oncological medicine and research, cancer remains the second leading cause of death in Europe with Central and Eastern European countries, such as Slovakia and Croatia, showing the highest mortality rates and disparities in access to appropriate and comprehensive cancer care. Therefore, the primary aim of the current study is to investigate cancer patients' perspectives and experiences to understand the possible underlying reasons for cancer disparities. Methods: Croatian cancer patients (n=15) and Slovak patients (n=11) were recruited through social media platforms, patients' organisations, and hospital websites and offered participation in online focus group discussions on perceived disparities, barriers or malfunctioning during and after their cancer journey. Transcripts of video and audio recordings of the interviews were translated and analysed using Thematic analysis. Results: Six Croatian and five Slovak themes emerged from the focus group discussions highlighting encountered barriers and perceived disparities, as well as suggestions or unmet needs. Most of the themes are common to both groups, such as the lack of information and use of the internet, and the taboos regarding cancer or psycho-oncological support. However, some themes are specific to each group, for instance, Slovak cancer patients remarked the fact that they do not mind travelling to get treatment as long as they can be treated in the west of Slovakia, while Croatian patients highlighted the need for more information after the illness and the socioeconomic impact deriving from a cancer diagnosis. Discussion: Urgent intervention is needed in addressing disparities in Central and Eastern Europe. Present results could inform dedicated guidelines or better resource allocation strategies to reduce disparities in cancer care and promote inclusive healthcare.

Indexed as

cancer disparitiescancer dividecancer inequalitiescancer tabooCentral-Eastern Europedigital dividehealthcare system corruptionpsycho-oncology

Identifiers

PMID39184044
PMCPMC11341380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.