ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Construction of a risk prediction model for lung infection after chemotherapy in lung cancer patients based on the machine learning algorithm.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning prediction of postoperative pulmonary infection in patients who underwent thoracoscopic lung cancer resection: a retrospective case-control study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Prediction of High-Risk Infections in Patients With Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- A multicenter study of automatic segmentation-based multimodal fusion integrating radiomics, deep learning, and clinical parameters for prostate cancer detection.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning model predicts postoperative complications after thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor surgery: a multicenter study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- IDH mutation prediction in non-enhancing gliomas with relaxed T2-FLAIR mismatch and fractal dimension: a two-center study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Exosomal gene-based predictive model and therapeutic target identification for Alzheimer's disease: A bioinformatics analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Non-invasive prediction of the first ventilatory threshold in Chinese patients with chronic heart failure for personalized exercise prescription.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine-learning model to accurately identify women at risk of excessive gestational weight gain.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Machine Learning Models to Predict Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) With Simple Anthropometric and Biochemical Variables: A Cross-Sectional Study in US Population.International journal of hepatology · 2026Article
- CT Radiomics for the Early Identification of Fungal Co-infection in Immunocompromised Patients with Viral PneumoniaCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Prediction of pulmonary infection during chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: development and internal validation of a nomogram.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Prediction of Recurrence After Endometrial Polypectomy in Women of Childbearing Age Based on Machine Learning Algorithm.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Enhancing prognostic accuracy in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: a machine learning approach.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Machine learning prediction of osteoarthritis risk from volatile organic compound exposure using SHAP interpretation in US adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancing prognostic and therapeutic prediction in lung squamous cell carcinoma through integrated multi-omics analysis and 117 machine learning combinations.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Harnessing natural killer cell-related genes for prognostic and therapeutic advances in lung adenocarcinoma: a predictive model for survival and immunotherapy outcomes.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Development, deployment, and feature interpretability of a three-class prediction model for pulmonary diseases.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Study on a Traditional Chinese Medicine constitution recognition model using tongue image characteristics and deep learning: a prospective dual-center investigation.Chinese medicine · 2025Article
- Ensemble machine learning models for lung cancer incidence risk prediction in the elderly: a retrospective longitudinal study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Interpretable machine learning-based predictive model for malnutrition in subacute post-stroke patients: an internal and external validation study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to create and validate a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting the likelihood of lung infections following chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of 502 lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Data on age, Body Mass Index (BMI), underlying disease, chemotherapy cycle, number of hospitalizations, and various blood test results were collected from medical records. We used the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to handle unbalanced data. Feature screening was performed using the Boruta algorithm and The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). Subsequently, six ML algorithms, namely Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) were employed to train and develop an ML model using a 10-fold cross-validation methodology. The model's performance was evaluated through various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, calibration curve, decision curves, clinical impact curve, and confusion matrix. In addition, model interpretation was performed by the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis to clarify the importance of each feature of the model and its decision basis. Finally, we constructed nomograms to make the predictive model results more readable. Results: The integration of Boruta and LASSO methodologies identified Gender, Smoke, Drink, Chemotherapy cycles, pleural effusion (PE), Neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), Neutrophil-monocyte count ratio (NMR), Lymphocytes (LYM) and Neutrophil (NEUT) as significant predictors. The LR model demonstrated superior performance compared to alternative ML algorithms, achieving an accuracy of 81.80%, a sensitivity of 81.1%, a specificity of 82.5%, an F1 score of 81.6%, and an AUC of 0.888(95%CI(0.863-0.911)). Furthermore, the SHAP method identified Chemotherapy cycles and Smoke as the primary decision factors influencing the ML model's predictions. Finally, this study successfully constructed interactive nomograms and dynamic nomograms. Conclusion: The ML algorithm, combining demographic and clinical factors, accurately predicted post-chemotherapy lung infections in cancer patients. The LR model performed well, potentially improving early detection and treatment in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.