Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39183981›Full record

ArticleClinical simulation in nursing2024

Development and Evaluation of a Metric-based Clinical Simulation Procedure for Assessing Ostomy Care in Nursing Practice.

Marketa Haughey, Melinda Harman, Casey Hopkins, Amanda Watson, Corbin Goodwin, Jenna Hines, Katelyn Sullivan, Chris Gonzaga, Abigail Washburn, David M Neyens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical simulation in nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Variability in Procedural Tasks and Decisions Made During Ostomy Pouching System Changes Performed by Nurses With Different Nursing Credentials: A Clinical Simulation Study.Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marketa HaugheyDept. of Bioengineering, 301 Rhodes Engineering Research Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 USA.
Melinda HarmanDept. of Bioengineering, 301 Rhodes Engineering Research Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 USA.
Casey HopkinsSchool of Nursing, Clemson University, 605 Grove Road, Greenville, SC 29605 USA.
Amanda WatsonSchool of Nursing, Clemson University, 605 Grove Road, Greenville, SC 29605 USA.
Corbin GoodwinDept. of Bioengineering, 301 Rhodes Engineering Research Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 USA.
Jenna HinesDept. of Bioengineering, 301 Rhodes Engineering Research Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 USA.
Katelyn SullivanSchool of Nursing, Clemson University, 605 Grove Road, Greenville, SC 29605 USA.
Chris GonzagaDept. of Industrial Engineering, 100 Freeman Hall, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 USA.
Abigail WashburnWound Healing and Hyperbaric Medicine Center-Greenville, Prisma Health-Upstate, 200 Patewood Drive, Suite C300, Greenville, SC 29615 USA.
David M NeyensDept. of Industrial Engineering, 100 Freeman Hall, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 USA; Dept. of Bioengineering, 301 Rhodes Engineering Research Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 USA.

Funding

Tissue Structural and Neural Remodeling in Human Sacroiliac JointP20GM121342 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI Peng Chen · 2018 to 2026
$24.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a need to understand the clinical decision-making and work practices within ostomy nursing care to support expanding nursing training. Objective: To develop and evaluate a new metric-based simulation for assessing ostomy nursing care using a human factors approach. Sample: This pilot study involved eleven stakeholders in the needs assessment, six nurse participants performing simulated ostomy care, and three independent observers assessing procedure reliability. Method: We conducted a needs assessment of ostomy nursing care and training, developed an enhanced metric-based simulation for ostomy appliance change procedures, and statistically evaluated its reliability for measuring the simulated tasks. Results: The enhanced metric-based simulation captured different tasks within four task categories: product selection; stoma and peristomal skin care; baseplate sizing and adhesion; and infection control strategies. The video review procedure was reliable for assessing continuous (average ICC≥0.96) and categorical (average κ>0.96) variables. Conclusion: The new metric-based simulation was suitable for characterizing a broad range of clinical decision-making and work practices in ostomy nursing care.

Indexed as

Benner’s modelclinical simulation of ostomy appliance changehuman factors in healthcareostomy nursing caresimulated ostomy effluent

Identifiers

PMID39183981
PMCPMC11340653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.