ArticleChemical science2024
Switchable molecular electrocatalysis.
Article in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- POM-Based Water Splitting Catalyst Under Acid Conditions Driven by Its Assembly on Carbon Nanotubes.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Efficient and Scalable Electrochemical Energy Systems via Peroxide-Mediated Redox Chemistry.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Controlling electrocatalytic nitrate reduction efficiency by utilizing dπ-pπ interactions in parallel stacking molecular systems.Chemical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We demonstrate a switchable electrocatalysis mechanism modulated by hydrogen bonding interactions in ligand geometries. By manipulating these geometries, specific electrochemical processes at a single catalytic site can be selectively and precisely activated or deactivated. The α geometry enhances dioxygen electroreduction (ORR) while inhibiting protium redox processes, with the opposite effect seen in the β geometry. Intramolecular hydrogen bonding in the α geometry boosts electron density at the catalytic center, facilitating a shift of ORR to a 4-electron pathway. Conversely, the β geometry promotes a 2-electron ORR and facilitates electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution through an extensive proton charge assembly; offering a paradigm shift to conventional electrocatalytic principles. The expectations that ligand geometry induced electron density modulations in the catalytic metal centre would have a comparable impact on both ORR and HER has been questioned due to the contrasting reactivity exhibited by α-geometry and β-geometry molecules. This further emphasizes the complex and intriguing nature of the roles played by ligands in molecular electrocatalysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.