ArticleBioinformatics advances2024
In the twilight zone of protein sequence homology: do protein language models learn protein structure?
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- LoMuS: low-rank adaptation with sequence multi-representation improves protein stability prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Deep homology and design of proteasome chaperone proteins in Candidozyma auris.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A generative explainable model for antimicrobial peptide prediction using bidirectional temporal convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- ViralBindPredict: empowering viral protein-ligand binding sites through deep learning and protein sequence-derived insights.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Identification of novel metagenomic lipases through integrated structural and sequence-based analysis.PeerJ · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Protein language models based on the transformer architecture are increasingly improving performance on protein prediction tasks, including secondary structure, subcellular localization, and more. Despite being trained only on protein sequences, protein language models appear to implicitly learn protein structure. This paper investigates whether sequence representations learned by protein language models encode structural information and to what extent. Results: We address this by evaluating protein language models on remote homology prediction, where identifying remote homologs from sequence information alone requires structural knowledge, especially in the "twilight zone" of very low sequence identity. Through rigorous testing at progressively lower sequence identities, we profile the performance of protein language models ranging from millions to billions of parameters in a zero-shot setting. Our findings indicate that while transformer-based protein language models outperform traditional sequence alignment methods, they still struggle in the twilight zone. This suggests that current protein language models have not sufficiently learned protein structure to address remote homology prediction when sequence signals are weak. Availability and implementation: We believe this opens the way for further research both on remote homology prediction and on the broader goal of learning sequence- and structure-rich representations of protein molecules. All code, data, and models are made publicly available.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.