Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39183308›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2025

Neuromonitoring practices for neonates with congenital heart disease: a scoping review.

Andrea C Pardo, Melisa Carrasco, Pia Wintermark, Denise Nunes, Valerie Y Chock, Shawn Sen, Courtney J Wusthoff, Newborn Brain Society, Guidelines and Publications Committee

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea C PardoDepartment of Pediatrics (Neurology and Epilepsy). Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, US. Andrea.pardo@northwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7767-8539
Melisa CarrascoDepartment of Neurology. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, US.
Pia WintermarkDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Qc, Canada.
Denise NunesGalter Health Sciences Library. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, US.
Valerie Y ChockDepartment of Pediatrics (Neonatology), Lucile Packard Children's Hospital and Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, US.
Shawn SenDepartment of Pediatrics (Neonatology). Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, US.
Courtney J WusthoffDepartment of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, US.
Newborn Brain Society, Guidelines and Publications Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonates with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk for adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. This scoping review summarizes neuromonitoring methods in neonates with CHD. We identified 84 studies investigating the use of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) (n = 37), electroencephalography (EEG) (n = 20), amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) (n = 10), transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) (n = 6), and multimodal monitoring (n = 11). NIRS was used to evaluate cerebral oxygenation, identify risk thresholds and adverse events in the intensive care unit (ICU), and outcomes. EEG was utilized to screen for seizures and to predict adverse outcomes. Studies of aEEG have focused on characterizing background patterns, detecting seizures, and outcomes. Studies of TCD have focused on correlation with short-term clinical outcomes. Multimodal monitoring studies characterized cerebral physiologic dynamics. Most of the studies were performed in single centers, had a limited number of neonates (range 3-183), demonstrated variability in neuromonitoring practices, and lacked standardized approaches to neurodevelopmental testing. We identified areas of improvement for future research: (1) large multicenter studies to evaluate developmental correlates of neuromonitoring practices; (2) guidelines to standardize neurodevelopmental testing methodologies; (3) research to address geographic variation in resource utilization; (4) integration and synchronization of multimodal monitoring; and (5) research to establish a standardized framework for neuromonitoring techniques across diverse settings. IMPACT: This scoping review summarizes the literature regarding neuromonitoring practices in neonates with congenital heart disease (CHD). The identification of low cerebral oxygenation thresholds with NIRS may be used to identify neonates at risk for adverse events in the ICU or adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. Postoperative neuromonitoring with continuous EEG screening for subclinical seizures and status epilepticus, allow for early and appropriate therapy. Future studies should focus on enrolling larger multicenter cohorts of neonates with CHD with a standardized framework of neuromonitoring practices in this population. Postoperative neurodevelopmental testing should utilize standard assessments and testing intervals.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalElectroencephalographyHumansInfant, NewbornMonitoring, PhysiologicSeizuresSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredUltrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial

Identifiers

PMID39183308
PMCPMC12119335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.