Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39183256›Full record

ReviewIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2024

Cognitive Capacities as Functional Natural Kinds.

Claudia-Lorena García, Mariana Salcedo-Gómez, Alejandro Vázquez-Del-Mercado

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claudia-Lorena GarcíaInstituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, México.ORCID 0000-0003-1426-2450
Mariana Salcedo-GómezDivisión de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, CDMX, México. msalcedo@cua.uam.mx.ORCID 0000-0002-5021-0546
Alejandro Vázquez-Del-MercadoFacultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, México.ORCID 0000-0003-0686-3782

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we articulate a functional approach to cognitive capacities. It is a restricted functionalism for various reasons, but especially because it does not claim that all cognitive (and/or mental) entities and processes are functional in the sense of a systemic capacities approach. One of the central aims of a cognitive theory consists in providing explanations of behavioral phenomena of (human and non-human) animals, and of the phenomena that are involved in those explanations. We accept that part of what lies at the heart of these explanations are certain functional entities -we call them "cognitive functional systems" -which in our view stand for most of the cognitive capacities of an organism; that is, systems that are individuated primarily by the main cognitive functions they undertake. Additionally, in the paper, we go into further detail concerning these functional systems, their internal organization, the nature of their causal interactions, etc. We also argue that some of these classes of cognitive functional systems (i.e., cognitive capacities) can be construed as "natural kinds" whenever their kinds of functional organizations are understood as kinds of hierarchically ordered classes of information processing events that are related among each other in regular (often complex) ways.

Indexed as

CognitionAnimalsHumansPsychological TheoryCognitive explanationCognitive variationIndividuation of cognitive capacitiesInterventionist causationMechanismsMultiple realizationNeurocognitive integration

Identifiers

PMID39183256
PMCPMC11638280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.