SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2024
Reference guides for the safe use of drugs during pregnancy: a systematic review and comparative analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drug safety during pregnancy: a challenging and ever moving field.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo comprehensively evaluate and compare all the available reference guides for the safe use of drugs during pregnancy, with the goal of determining the scientificity and reliability of these reference guides.
methodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang Database, and VIP database to comprehensively identify the available reference guides. Moreover, we selected 103 drugs based on relevant literatures, and compared the recommendations of each drug from different reference guides.
resultsA total of 14 available reference guides were identified. However, none of these reference guides assessed the risk of bias of original studies or the quality of current evidence. Seven reference guides adopted expert consensus method to formulate pregnancy recommendations, while the rest reference guides did not report the formation method. Moreover, 77.7% of the selected drugs had inconsistent recommendations among different reference guides. In addition, the referenced human and animal studies for the same drug differed among different reference guides.
conclusionOur results indicate that current reference guides for the safe use of drugs during pregnancy are less scientific and reliable, and there are considerable discrepancies in recommendations from different reference guides concerning drug use during pregnancy. The reasons for the discrepancies in recommendations include ① the literature search in most reference guides was not comprehensive, ② none of the available reference guides assessed the risk of bias of original studies or the quality of current evidence, and ③ the method adopted by current reference guides to formulate recommendations had obvious subjectivity and lacked of scientificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39183195What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.